Eligibility: Ardo Surrenders At Supreme Court

By Ade Adesomoju, The Punch

An acclaimed presidential aspirant on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party, Dr. Umar Ardo, has dropped his intention to join a suit challenging the eligibility of President Goodluck Jonathan to seek re-election in 2015.

His lawyer, Dr. Abiodun Amuda-Kannike (SAN), on Tuesday bowed to pressure by the seven-man panel of the Supreme Court  which persuaded him to withdraw the appeal in respect of his (Ardo’s) bid to join the main suit.

Ardo had gone to the Supreme Court to challenge the decision of the Court of Appeal in Abuja which disallowed him to join a pending appeal on Jonathan’s eligibility to seek a re-run.

However, at the scheduled hearing of Ardo’s case on Tuesday, the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Mahmud Mohammed, who headed the panel, sought to clarify misconceptions about the appeal after counsel for the parties announced their appearances.

Justice Mohammed faulted the basis for filing the appeal which he said was unwarranted and had stalled the hearing of the main suit still pending before the Court of Appeal.

Other six members of the appeal panel also took turn to pointedly say that the appeal lacked merit and reminded Amuda-Kannike that his integrity was at stake if he refused to heed to the warning that he should withdraw the appeal.

One of the members of the appeal panel, Justice Bode Rhodes-Vivour, told the lawyer that the Court of Appeal rightly dismissed Ardo’s application to join the suit as an appellant on the grounds that the leave of the court was not sought before applying to be joined.

The CJN also particularly frowned on an invitation by Ardo’s appeal seeking the apex court’s pronouncement on the merit of the main case still pending before the Court of Appeal.

Justice Mohammed said, “We can’t wear the shoe of the Court of Appeal. We cannot sit down here and decide on the merit of the main appeal which is still pending before the Court of Appeal. 

“We don’t have the jurisdiction to do so. The constitution does not give us such power.”

He urged Amuda-Kannike to withdraw the suit so that the Court of Appeal could reach a decision on the matter.

The CJN said, “Allow the Court of Appeal to decide on the substantive suit. All of us, including your client, cannot be parties in a suit.

“One person can file a suit on constitutional issue and the court will make a decision that will be beneficial to all.”

Amuda-Kannike who was on his feet throughout the proceedings tried in futility to convince the apex court to hear the appeal.

He later bowed to prayer by applying for the withdrawal of the appeal.

Credit: The Punch